Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et Decorum Est. Essay -- English Liter

Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et decorousness Est.Dulce ET Decorum Est is an anti-war poem, which emphasizes theintensity of war. The meaning of the ironic title roughly translatedinto it is profound and honourable hardly is not unspoilty established untilyou examine the poem. The full title Dulce ET Decorum Est Pro PatriaMori means it is good and honourable to bust for your country.However the main aspect of this poem is paradoxical to its title. Thisdemonstrates the centre Wilfred Owens is insinuating and hisattitude towards war.The poem is regarding Wilfred Owen and his troop of exhausted passsmaking their steering back to base after combat at the front eviscerate until agas shell is fired at them. A soldier is fatally gassed, is put in anambulance dying slowly and then eaten away(predicate) from the inside.Owen describes a man being engulfed by gas,Dim through the stuporous panes and thick green light,Under a green sea I saw him drowning.The death and distress is show n and the harsh actuality of waruncovered. It is almost as though you are reliving the agony the manis suffering. The reader is nowhere near as unfortunate as Wilfred. Hewas repeatedly hagridden by his experiences even after having toencounter them.In all my dreams forrader my helpless sight,He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.It is an inescapable memory that haunts him even when he attempts tosleep, on constant replay in his treacherous mind. His feeling of failing from that moment were captured and frozen, regret for nothelping covered with hope, the possibility that he was unable to doanything useful anyway. A sense of regret, disbelief and temper arereused in other anti-war poems that Wilfred Owen ha... ... aid the pain once and tranquilendured. Owen has created a way that transports the reader back to thescene of the poem. Using the effectualness of the senses. He describesthe sounds, the smells and the sights around to give the feeling thatyou witnessing the h appenings expressed.My final contemplations to conclude this compend are not in despairbut queries, whether it is rhetorical or not I am not completely sure.The thing that concerns me is how the judicature send men off to fightwar when under the mistake that they are fighting for theircountry? Do they have no conscious, no guilt in sending the doomedyouth off to their required deaths? The decisions they makeobviously have repercussions as do all decisions, but to knowinglycondemn so many innocent people to somatogenetic and mental torture thendeath, to me is worse murder, is it not?