Arthur Millers Presentation Of John Proctors Moral Journey Essay

Examine Arthur moth millers Presentation Of John Proctors Moral Journey - The Crucible by Arthur milling machineThe Crucible by Arthur Miller is a play based upon an Americansettlement during the late 1600s. It is centred around goual eventsfrom history to try to portray the way of life in this era. Miller haschosen the confusion of the witch trials of this time, to provide abase for the struggles of his main feature, John Proctor.At the beginning of the play the focus is laid mainly on introducingthe main characters and storyline, but as the script unfolds, itbecomes clear that John Proctor is the main character, something notimmediately obvious from the beginning. It is how Miller presents anddemonstrates Proctors moral journey without the play, and thedifferent channels he uses to do this that I will focus on.Act One really only sets the scene for the play by word picture thedifferent characters in the Salem and how their ways of life revolvemostly around the church and their religion. The inhabitants can forthe most part be sectioned off into trey groups the establishedfigures, eg. Rev. Parris the citizens, and people who have in theoryearned their status, eg. Francis and Rebecca Nurse and theoutsiders, eg. Rev. Hale. This set-up seems to work well until theevents of the play, when people become separated by their views, andeveryone begins blaming others for their shortcomings in order to mention their authority and status. The main power in the villagebeing the church, indwellingly the Rev. Parris will do anything to keephis position, especially as Miller informs us that his character feelsthat for some reason everyone in the world is against him, and hislife is jus... ... which he wasinnocent. At the very end, when he knew what would happen to him,Proctor refused to publish a lie approximately himself, or admit to a sin hedid not commit. This shows at least some remnant of pride was left,even after everything he had been through - and this is wha t saves himin the end. It makes him realise that John Proctor wasnt as evil ashe had thought, that, like everyone else, he was a mixture, and nowwith absolutely nothing to hide. Possibly, this act may cancel outJohns adultery, especially as there is a lot of confusion around whatare actually evil acts, and what are just natural flaws andinstincts. Elizabeth says right at the end of the play,He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from him..This suggests goodness and reconciliation in Proctors act, as the one time shallow and indecisive John, is finally decisive.