The Scope of Woolf’s Feminism in A Room of One’s Own Essay -- Woolf A

The Scope of Woolfs Feminism in A Room of bingles OwnMissing Works CitedA highly contested statement on women and fiction, Virginia Woolfs extended experiment A Room of Ones Own has been repeatedly reviewed, critiqued, and analyse sinceits publication in 1929. Arnold Bennett, an early twentieth-century novelist, and DavidDaiches, a literary critic who wrote an outline entitled Virginia Woolf in 1942 (Murphy247), were among those to attempt to extricate the themes and implications of Woolfscomplex essay. The deuce critics deal with the often-discussed feminist aspect of Woolfsessay in interestingly different ways. Bennett states that Woolfs essay is not a feminist take, rejects the report that Woolfs discussion of women and fiction may lean towards the political, and reduces the essays background to a collection of musings on women and fiction.Daiches responds to A Room of Ones Own in the opposite way he claims that Woolfswork is feminist, and Woolfs feminism emphasizes not only women and theirrelationship to fiction, barely all people of genius who have not had an opportunity to hold itbecause of their lack of m superstary and privacy. While Bennett restricts the scope of theessay to a non- feminist, tout ensemble apolitical ideology and Daiches enlarges the scope toa wide, universal feminism, Woolfs stimulate intention in writing A Room of Ones Own mayhave actually been to create a work that lay somewhere in between these two extremes.In one of the earliest reviews of A Room of Ones Own, British novelist ArnoldBennett communicate the question of feminism in the essay and concluded that Woolf wasnot writing from a feminist perspective. It is a book a little some men and a great dealabout women. But it is no... ...ments do point out important limits on Woolfs feminism. As Arnold Bennett says, Woolfs concerns are not political althoughour modern definition of feminism is wider than Bennetts was, Woolfs lack of politicalinterest does certainly limit the scope of her feminism. David Daichess critique of theessay points out another important feature film of Woolfs feminist thought. Herfeminism is not, as Daiches believes based in a larger democratic feeling. Woolfsfeminism is in actuality quite check in tha t she only applies it to British, upper middleclass women writers. Virginia Woolfs essay-which to Bennett seemed non- feminist and to Daiches seemed feminist- universalist-is, by our modern definition, feminist however, the borders of culture, class, and profession that composed her frame of reference drastically limit the scope of Woolfs feminism.